Gather Your Wits - Esther
Youth Making a Face, Adriaen Brouwer
You can laugh. It’s fine. You won’t get thrown out of the gallery.
There’s an old-fashioned concept of art as a serious, weighty subject.
Told another way, humorous art is considered lowbrow, unworthy, devoid of
merit. Similar to TV, art was supposed to enlighten, inspire & raise up the
viewer, provide them with education & instruction. Hah! Look how that
turned out.
Anonymous, Southern Netherlands, Satirical Diptych
If we accept that art can encompass & reflect all aspects of human life
& more, then there have to be times it’s allowed to be humorous. Humour is
for everyone that gets it. It’s universal & inclusive, although we could
argue about what we regard as funny. Who couldn’t do with a laugh right now? If
humour isn’t a crucial part of your life, I sincerely don’t know how you get through
it. As ever, art is there to help us out.
It’s rarely a good idea to analyse why
something is funny. When you have to explain a joke to someone that doesn’t get
it the first time, the humour is killed stone dead.
In an attempt to find ways to ruin today’s visual jokes for you, I went in
search of “science.” Science never lets me down & the science I found (here:
https://theconversation.com/science-deconstructs-humor-what-makes-some-things-funny-64414)
explains what makes jokes funny by categorising them under different theories:
The Superiority Theory – an often mean-spirited look at others &
possibly their adversities that makes you feel like you’re better than them or
glad something’s not happening to you.
The Relief Theory – something awful is happening or being talked about
& the tension builds, but PHEW! It’s turned into something funny!
The Incongruity Theory – putting unexpected things or ideas together that
don’t belong together for a laugh. The element of surprise.
The Benign Violations Theory – things you shouldn’t be laughing at. But you
are. You dreadful, dreadful person. It might be harmless but you should still
be ashamed of yourself.
Lombard School, c.1700 Cats Being Instructed in the Art of Mouse-Catching By an Owl
If you can make people laugh, they’ll forgive you many misdeeds. & don’t
most people have a darker element to their humour these days? Doesn’t the act
of laughing at certain things shame you into gasping, sucking in air or
giggling behind your hand? Laughter is a release, whether we are ashamed of
ourselves or not.
As well as jokes, it turns out these “scientific” theories actually work when
applied to art. The incongruous is at the core of Surrealism & confronting
taboos of all kinds is a key feature of modern art & always finds an
audience.
William Wegman
But is it FUNNY?
As with all opinions, this is wildly subjective but I’ve collected a few
pieces that manage to raise this writer’s reluctant smile. I’m putting satire,
memes, comics & cartoons aside here, since there are entire
blogs-in-waiting for these subjects. Nor am I selecting work that has
once-fashionable symbolic or coded humour. I’m sticking to visual art (paintings,
drawings, photographs) that can actually
get a cackle out of me in varying degrees of uproariousness. They probably say
more about me than I’d like you to know. (As an aside, writing about this has
made me feel I’m baring my soul & I’m now slightly worried you won’t find
my choices funny. This makes me feel somewhat insecure, which goes to show how
fundamental humour is to our being).
Pieter Brueghel the Younger, The Flatterers
There has been humour (intended or otherwise) in art for centuries, even
fine art. Even among the Dutch masters. Take Rembrandt’s Good Samaritan etching. If you’re not familiar with it, yes, that
dog is taking a poop. & if you don’t think the method The Angel Departing From the Family of Tobias takes to disappear
into the heavens isn’t a little bit silly, I just don’t know what to tell you.
Gerard van Honthorst frequently depicted people enjoying themselves or laughing
but the most universally & contemporarily understood work may well be Smiling Girl, a Courtesan, Holding an
Obscene Image. I think it speaks for itself…
& in a similar vein, Jan Steen leaves us in no doubt about what’s going
on here in Wine is a Mocker. & so
here we are on our Superiority Theory high ground.
Grandiose, pretentious, arrogant. If you thought these were negative
traits, you were right however Salvador Dalí made a career out of them to
sometimes hilarious effect. He’d strive to make himself as much a work of art
as anything else. You might find him creepy. Sorry but that’s kind of funny too
(see: Benign Violations Theory probably). The face-pulling, the showing off
& general mucking about in front of a camera (not his own) demonstrates an
endearing (Dalíesque or Pythonesque?) willingness to look stupid for our
amusement.
On the other hand, his artworks are probably more witty or clever than
laugh aloud funny. Then again, I know a burning giraffe is no laughing matter, let
alone a corridor of them, but it’s just so daft…
It takes great cleverness & dedication to your joke to make a
successfully funny sculpture. This can be achieved with a touch of impudence,
as in Michael Elmgreen & Ingar Dragset’s Marriage & Gay Marriage
respectively. The arch side of our humour enjoys their capacity to play to our
assumptions about every day life & how others might live. I find placing
the two images together develops this concept more strongly.
My most beloved humorous visual artist is David Shrigley. He’s extremely
prolific & disciplined, giving himself a certain number of drawings to do
per day. The style is not the point. His work is often silly, downright
puerile, panicky, scatological, rude, sweary & distinctive. Some of them
leave me helpless with laughter.
There are many artists today working in a similar way & spirit, but the
best of the others in my opinion is Nathaniel Russell, who combines text with
photographs to subvert the familiar:
In David Shrigley’s vast body of work, you’ll find perhaps all the theories
of what makes jokes funny. There is so much of it that for every few you don’t
laugh at, you might find one that cracks you up. I could flood you further with
my favourites, but after Rembrandt’s dog fouling behaviour, I’m keeping it
clean.
Comments
Post a Comment